“Be rational!” Epistemic aims and socio-cognitive tension in argumentation about dietary choices - Département Sciences économiques et sociales Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Frontiers in Psychology Année : 2022

“Be rational!” Epistemic aims and socio-cognitive tension in argumentation about dietary choices

Résumé

Argumentation is a social practice that can lead to epistemic outcomes, that is, to the construction of knowledge. Recent research in collaborative learning has pointed out the significance of affective and motivational aspects, as well as the influence of socio-relational concerns, which have been found to frequently take priority over epistemic ones. Our research objective is to investigate how the epistemic and socio-relational dimensions of students' argumentative interactions are intertwined. We apply discourse analysis to examine the interactions in a small group of four 11th-graders evaluating the nutritional acceptability of omnivorous and vegetarian diets. The epistemic dimension is analyzed in terms of the aims pursued by the participants and the epistemic outcomes achieved. The socio-relational dimension is analyzed in terms of fluctuations of interpersonal tensions and their relaxations. The results show a convergence of participants' epistemic aims and the epistemic statuses of the options. Most of the epistemic outcomes are produced in sequences in which socio-cognitive tension arises and then relaxes. Enduring high socio-cognitive tension and overcoming conflict seem to have encouraged the adoption of epistemic aims. Moreover, our findings suggest that driven by epistemic aims in high socio-cognitive tensed contexts, students can refine the conditions by which they engage in argumentation. These results call for further investigating on what constitutes an appropriate or productive level of interpersonal tension for learning. Educational implications are related to the design of argumentative learning environments promoting epistemic aims and outcomes through the encouragement of suitable socio-cognitive climates leading to them.

Domaines

Psychologie
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Brocos-Jiminez-Baker-2022-FrontiersInPsychology.pdf (1.11 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Publication financée par une institution

Dates et versions

hal-03855572 , version 1 (12-12-2022)

Identifiants

Citer

Pablo Brocos, María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre, Michael Baker. “Be rational!” Epistemic aims and socio-cognitive tension in argumentation about dietary choices. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13, pp.933062. ⟨10.3389/fpsyg.2022.933062⟩. ⟨hal-03855572⟩
68 Consultations
23 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More