M. A. Britt, The Interaction of Referential Ambiguity and Argument Structure in the Parsing of Prepositional Phrases, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.33, issue.2, pp.251-283, 1994.
DOI : 10.1006/jmla.1994.1013

M. A. Britt, C. A. Perfetti, S. Garrod, and K. Rayner, Parsing in discourse: Context effects and their limits, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.31, issue.3, pp.293-314, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/0749-596X(92)90015-P

M. Brysbaert and D. C. Mitchell, Modifier attachment in sentence parsing: Evidence from Dutch, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, issue.3, pp.49-664, 1996.

M. Brysbaert, T. Desmet, and D. C. Mitchell, Modifier attachment in Dutch: Testing the linguistic tuning hypothesis. Poster presented at AMLaP, pp.23-25, 1999.

M. Carreiras and C. Clifton, Relative clause interpretation preferences in Spanish and English, Language and Speech, vol.36, issue.4, pp.353-372, 1993.

M. Carreiras and C. Clifton, Another word on parsing relative clauses: Eyetracking evidence from Spanish and English, Memory & Cognition, vol.50, issue.5, pp.826-833, 1999.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03198535

C. Clifton, Restrictions on late closure: Appearance and reality. Paper presented at the 6 th Australian Language and Speech conference, 1988.

C. Clifton, Thematic roles in sentence parsing., Reading and language processing, pp.94-118, 1995.
DOI : 10.1037/h0078817

C. Clifton and F. Ferreira, Ambiguity in context, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.39, issue.3-4, pp.77-103, 1989.
DOI : 10.1016/0749-596X(87)90111-2

C. Clifton, J. Bock, and J. Rado, Effects of the Focus Particle Only and Intrinsic Contrast on Comprehension of Reduced Relative Clauses, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-008043642-5/50028-0

C. Clifton, L. Frazier, and C. Connine, Lexical expectations in sentence comprehension, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, vol.23, issue.6, pp.696-708, 1984.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90426-2

A. Content, P. Mousty, and M. Radeau, Brulex : une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le Français écrit et parlé. L'Année Psychologique, pp.551-566, 1990.
DOI : 10.3406/psy.1990.29428

URL : http://www.persee.fr/docAsPDF/psy_0003-5033_1990_num_90_4_29428.pdf

M. M. Corley, The role of statistics in human sentence processing, 1996.

S. Coulson, J. W. King, and M. Kutas, Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.13, issue.1, pp.21-58, 1998.
DOI : 10.1017/S0140525X00058015

S. Crain and M. J. Steedman, On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological parser, Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives, pp.320-358, 1985.

F. Cuetos and D. C. Mitchell, Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the Late Closure strategy in Spanish, Cognition, vol.30, issue.1, pp.73-105, 1988.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90004-2

F. Cuetos, D. C. Mitchell, and M. B. Corley, Parsing in different languages, Language processing in Spanish, 1996.

D. Vincenzi, M. Job, and R. , Some observations on the universality of the late-closure strategy, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol.22, issue.2, pp.189-206, 1993.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01067830

D. Vincenzi, M. Job, and R. , An investigation of late closure: The role of syntax, thematic structure, and pragmatics in initial interpretation., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.21, issue.5, pp.1303-1321, 1995.
DOI : 10.1037/0278-7393.21.5.1303

C. Debeacke, M. Brysbaert, and T. Desmet, Lexical and structural variables in modifier attachment: A corpus study in Dutch. Poster presented at Eleventh conference of the European Society for cognitive Psychology, 1999.

K. Ehrlich, E. Fernandez, J. D. Fodor, E. Stenshoel, and M. Vinereanu, Low attachment of relative clauses: New data from Swedish, Norwegian and Romanian. Poster presented at the 12 th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, 1999.

E. Fernandez, Bilingual sentence processing: Relative clause attachment in English and Spanish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, 2000.
DOI : 10.1075/lald.29

E. Fernandez and D. Bradley, Length effects in the attachment of relative clause in English. Poster presented at the 12 th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, 1920.

F. Ferreira and C. Clifton, The independence of syntactic processing, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.25, issue.3, pp.348-368, 1986.
DOI : 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90006-9

F. Ferreira and J. M. Henderson, Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: Evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.16, issue.4, pp.555-568, 1990.
DOI : 10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.555

F. Ferreira and J. M. Henderson, Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.30, issue.6, pp.725-736, 1991.
DOI : 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90034-H

C. Frenck-mestre and J. Pynte, Resolving Syntactic Ambiguities: Cross-Linguistic Differences?, Cross-linguistic perspectives on language processing, pp.119-148, 1999.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-011-3949-6_5

C. Frenck-mestre and J. Pynte, ???Romancing??? Syntactic Ambiguity: Why the French and the Italians don't See Eye to Eye, Reading as a perceptual process, pp.549-564, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-008043642-5/50026-7

M. Garnsey, Event-related brain potentials in the study of language: An introduction, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.5, issue.4, pp.337-356, 1993.
DOI : 10.1016/0013-4694(82)90227-9

E. Gibson, A computational theory of human linguistic processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, 1991.

E. Gibson, Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies, Cognition, vol.68, issue.1, pp.1-76, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1

E. Gibson and C. T. Schütze, Disambiguation Preferences in Noun Phrase Conjunction Do Not Mirror Corpus Frequency, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.40, issue.2, pp.263-279, 1999.
DOI : 10.1006/jmla.1998.2612

E. Gibson, N. J. Pearlmutter, and V. Torrens, Recency and lexical preferences in Spanish, Memory & Cognition, vol.33, issue.4, pp.603-611, 1999.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03211554

E. Gibson, N. Pearlmutter, E. Canseco-gonzalez, and G. Hickok, Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism, Cognition, vol.59, issue.1, pp.23-59, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00687-7

E. Gibson, C. T. Schütze, and A. Salomon, The relationship between the frequency and the processing complexity of linguistic structure, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol.27, issue.1, pp.59-92, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01708420

E. Gilboy and J. M. Sopena, Segmentation effects in the processing of complex NPs with relative clauses Language processing in Spanish, pp.191-206, 1996.

E. Gilboy, J. M. Sopena, C. Clifton, and L. Frazier, Argument structure and association preferences in Spanish and English complex NPs, Cognition, vol.54, issue.2, pp.131-167, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00636-Y

P. Gorrell, Syntax and parsing, 1995.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511627682

H. P. Grice, Logic and conversation, Syntax and semantic, pp.41-58, 1975.

F. Grosjean, How long is the sentence? Prediction and prosody in the on-line processing of language, Linguistics, vol.21, issue.3, pp.501-529, 1983.
DOI : 10.1515/ling.1983.21.3.501

P. Hagoort and C. Brown, Brain responses to lexical ambiguity resolution and parsing, 1994.

P. Hagoort, C. Brown, and J. Groothusen, The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.39, issue.4, pp.439-483, 1993.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03196995

A. Hahne and A. D. Friederici, Electrophysiological Evidence for Two Steps in Syntactic Analysis: Early Automatic and Late Controlled Processes, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol.22, issue.2, pp.194-205, 1999.
DOI : 10.1126/science.6879207

B. Hemforth, L. Konieczny, and C. Scheepers, Modifier Attachment: Relative Clauses and Coordinations, Cognitive parsing in German. Dordrecht, 2000.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-015-9618-3_6

B. Hemforth, L. Konieczny, and C. Scheepers, Syntactic attachment and anaphor resolution: The two sides of relative clause attachment Architecture and mechanisms of language processing Cambridge, pp.159-183, 2000.

B. Hemforth, L. Konieczny, C. Scheepers, and G. Strube, Syntactic ambiguity in German Syntax and semantic, sentence comprehension: A crosslinguistic perspective, pp.293-312, 1998.

J. Henstra, Relative clause attachment in English: Eye-tracking versus self-paced reading. Poster presented at AMLaP, pp.20-21, 1996.

T. W. Hogaboam, Reading pattern in eye movements, Eye movements in reading, pp.309-332, 1983.

V. M. Holmes, A. Kennedy, and W. S. Murray, Syntactic structure and the garden path, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, vol.9, issue.2, pp.277-293, 1987.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90236-0

J. M. Igoa, M. Carreiras, and E. Meseguer, A Study on Late Closure in Spanish: Principle-grounded vs. Frequency-based Accounts of Attachment Preferences, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, vol.47, issue.3, pp.51-561, 1998.
DOI : 10.1037/0278-7393.19.3.528

A. W. Inhoff and R. Radach, Definition and Computation of Oculomotor Measures in the Study of Cognitive Processes, Eye guidance in reading and scene perception, pp.29-54, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-008043361-5/50003-1

A. W. Inhoff and K. Rayner, Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency, Perception & Psychophysics, vol.17, issue.6, pp.431-439, 1986.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03208203

E. Javal, Essai sur la physiologie de la lecture. Annales d'Oculistique, pp.247-253, 1878.

F. Jennings, B. Randall, and L. K. Tyler, Graded Effects of Verb Subcategory Preferences on Parsing: Support for Constraint-satisfaction Models, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.22, issue.4, pp.485-504, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80027-3

D. Jurafsky, A Probabilistic Model of Lexical and Syntactic Access and Disambiguation, Cognitive Science, vol.32, issue.2, pp.137-194, 1996.
DOI : 10.1207/s15516709cog2002_1

M. A. Just and P. A. Carpenter, A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension., Psychological Review, vol.87, issue.4, pp.329-354, 1980.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329

M. A. Just, P. A. Carpenter, and J. D. Wooley, Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.111, issue.2, pp.228-238, 1982.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.228

Y. Kamide and D. C. Mitchell, Relative clause attachment: Nondeterminism in Japanese parsing, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol.26, issue.2, pp.247-254, 1997.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1025017817290

Y. Kamide and D. C. Mitchell, Incremental Pre-head Attachment in Japanese Parsing, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.3, issue.5-6, pp.631-662, 1999.
DOI : 10.1080/016909697386853

G. Kempen and E. Hoenkamp, An Incremental Procedural Grammar for Sentence Formulation, Cognitive Science, vol.104, issue.2, pp.201-258, 1987.
DOI : 10.1207/s15516709cog1102_5

A. Kennedy and W. S. Murray, Inspection times for words in syntactically ambiguous sentences under three presentation conditions., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.10, issue.6, pp.833-849, 1984.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.10.6.833

A. Kennedy, W. S. Murray, F. Jennings, and C. Reid, Parsing complements: Comments on the generality of the principle of minimal attachment, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.39, issue.3-4, pp.51-76, 1989.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(80)90013-X

J. Kimball, Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language, Cognition, vol.2, issue.1, pp.15-47, 1973.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(72)90028-5

L. Konieczny and B. Hemforth, Modifier Attachment in German: Relative Clauses and Prepositional Phrases, Reading as a perceptual process, pp.517-527, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-008043642-5/50024-3

L. Konieczny, B. Hemforth, C. Scheepers, and G. Strube, The Role of Lexical Heads in Parsing: Evidence from German, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.12, issue.2, pp.307-348, 1997.
DOI : 10.1080/016909697386871

M. Kutas and C. Van-petten, Event-related brain potential studies of language, 1998.

S. P. Liversedge, K. B. Paterson, and M. J. Pickering, Eye Movements and Measures of Reading Time, Eye guidance in reading and scene perception, pp.55-76, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-008043361-5/50004-3

S. P. Liversedge, M. J. Pickering, and M. J. Traxler, A comparative analysis of qualitatively different eye movement measures. Poster presented at the 9 th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, 1996.

N. Lovric and J. D. Fodor, Relative clause attachment in sentence parsing. Poster presented at the 13 th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, 2000.

M. C. Macdonald, The Interaction of Lexical and Syntactic Ambiguity, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.32, issue.5, pp.692-715, 1993.
DOI : 10.1006/jmla.1993.1035

M. C. Macdonald, Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.47, issue.2, pp.157-201, 1994.
DOI : 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90011-3

M. C. Macdonald, Distributional information in language comprehension, production, and acquisition: Three puzzles and a moral The emergence of language, pp.177-196, 1999.

M. C. Macdonald, N. J. Pearlmutter, and M. S. Seidenberg, The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution., Psychological Review, vol.101, issue.4, pp.676-703, 1994.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676

M. C. Macdonald, N. J. Pearlmutter, and M. S. Seidenberg, Syntactic ambiguity resolution as lexical ambiguity resolution, Perspectives on sentence processing, pp.123-153, 1994.

M. Marcus and D. Hindle, Description theory and intonation boundaries, 1990.

. Altmann, Cognitive models of speech processing, psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 483-512)

M. Marcus, D. Hindle, and M. M. Fleck, D-theory, Proceedings of the 21st annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics -, pp.15-17, 1983.
DOI : 10.3115/981311.981337

J. L. Mcclelland, Sentence comprehension: A parallel distributed processing approach, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.4, issue.3-4, pp.287-335, 1989.
DOI : 10.1207/s15516709cog1203_4

J. L. Mcclelland, M. K. St-john, and R. Taraban, Sentence comprehension: A parallel distributed processing approach, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.4, issue.3-4, pp.287-335, 1989.
DOI : 10.1207/s15516709cog1203_4

G. W. Mcconkie and K. Rayner, The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading, Perception & Psychophysics, vol.17, issue.6, pp.578-586, 1975.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03203972

B. Mcelree and T. Griffith, Syntactic and thematic processing in sentence comprehension: Evidence for a temporal dissociation., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.21, issue.1, pp.134-157, 1995.
DOI : 10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.134

K. Mcrae, M. J. Spivey-knowlton, and M. K. Tanenhaus, Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.38, issue.3, pp.283-312, 1998.
DOI : 10.1006/jmla.1997.2543

D. C. Mitchell, Verb guidance and other lexical effects in parsing, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.18, issue.3-4, pp.123-154, 1989.
DOI : 10.1207/s15516709cog0901_4

D. C. Mitchell, Sentence parsing, Handbook of psycholinguistics, pp.375-409, 1994.

D. C. Mitchell and M. Brysbaert, Challenge to recent theories of cross-linguistic variation in parsing: Evidence from Dutch Syntax and semantic, sentence comprehension: A cross-linguistic perspective, pp.313-335, 1998.

D. C. Mitchell and V. M. Holmes, The role of specific information about the verb in parsing sentences with local structural ambiguity, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.24, issue.5, pp.542-559, 1985.
DOI : 10.1016/0749-596X(85)90045-2

D. C. Mitchell, M. M. Corley, and A. Garnham, Effects of context in human sentence parsing: Evidence against a discourse-based proposal mechanism., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.18, issue.1, pp.69-88, 1992.
DOI : 10.1037/0278-7393.18.1.69

D. C. Mitchell, F. Cuetos, and M. B. Corley, Statistical vs. linguistic determinants of parsing bias: Cross-linguistic evidence. Paper presented at the 5 th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, 1992.

D. C. Mitchell, F. Cuetos, and D. Zagar, Reading in different language: Is there a universal mechanism for parsing sentences, Comprehension processes in reading, pp.285-301, 1990.

D. C. Mitchell, M. Brysbaert, S. Grondelaers, and P. Swanepoel, Modifier attachment in Dutch: Testing aspects of construal theory, Reading as a perceptual process, pp.493-517, 2000.

D. C. Mitchell, F. Cuetos, M. M. Corley, and M. Brysbaert, Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (nonlexical) statistical records, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol.19, issue.6, pp.469-488, 1995.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02143162

E. T. Miyamoto, Relative clause processing in Brazilian Portuguese and Japanese. Unpublished PhD thesis, 1999.

E. Miyamoto, T. Gibson, E. Pearlmutter, N. J. Aikawa, T. Miyagawa et al., A U-shaped Relative Clause Attachment Preference in Japanese, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.14, issue.5-6, pp.663-686, 1999.
DOI : 10.1080/01690968908406362

P. Monnin and F. Grosjean, Les structures de performances en Français : caractérisation et prédiction. L'année psychologique, pp.9-30, 1993.

W. S. Murray, Sentence Processing: Issues and Measures, Reading as a perceptual process, pp.649-664, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-008043642-5/50030-9

W. S. Murray and S. P. Liversedge, Referential context effects on syntactic processing, Perspectives on sentence processing, pp.359-388, 1994.

W. Ni, J. D. Fodor, S. Crain, and D. Shankweiler, Anomaly detection: Eye movement Pattern, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol.27, issue.5, pp.515-539, 1998.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1024996828734

L. Osterhout, Event-related brain potentials as tools for comprehending language comprehension, Perspectives on sentence processing, pp.15-43, 1994.

L. Osterhout and P. J. Holcomb, Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.3, issue.4, pp.413-437, 1993.
DOI : doi:10.1121/1.382142

C. A. Perfetti, The co-operative language processors: Semantic influences in an autonomous syntax, Comprehension processes in reading, pp.205-229, 1990.

M. J. Pickering, M. J. Traxler, and M. W. Crocker, Ambiguity Resolution in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Frequency-Based Accounts, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.43, issue.3, pp.447-475, 2000.
DOI : 10.1006/jmla.2000.2708

B. L. Pritchett, Garden Path Phenomena and the Grammatical Basis of Language Processing, Language, vol.64, issue.3, pp.539-576, 1988.
DOI : 10.2307/414532

J. Pynte, Programmation d'un expérience en psycholinguistique. Cahiers de Psychologie, pp.65-74, 1975.

J. Pynte, THE TIME COURSE OF ATTACHMENT DECISIONS: EVIDENCE FROM FRENCH, 1998.
DOI : 10.1108/S0092-4563(1998)0000031015

. Hillert, Syntax and semantics, sentence comprehension: Across-linguistic perspective

J. Pynte and S. Colonna, Competition between primary and non-primary relations during sentence comprehension, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00101362

J. Pynte and A. Kennedy, Referential context and within-word refixations: Evidence for "weak interaction, Perception and cognition, pp.227-238, 1993.

J. Pynte and B. Prieur, Prosodic Breaks and Attachment Decisions in Sentence Parsing, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.24, issue.1-2, pp.165-191, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0749-596X(87)90107-0

D. Quinn, H. Abdelghany, and J. D. Fodor, More evidence of implicit prosody in silent reading: French, English, and Arabic relative clauses. Poster presented at the 13 th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, 2000.

K. Rayner, Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research., Psychological Bulletin, vol.124, issue.3, pp.372-422, 1998.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372

K. Rayner and S. A. Duffy, Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity, Memory & Cognition, vol.36, issue.3, pp.191-201, 1986.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03197692

K. Rayner and L. Frazier, Parsing temporarily ambiguous complements, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, vol.11, issue.4, pp.657-673, 1987.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90236-0

K. Rayner and A. Pollatsek, The psychology of reading, 1989.

K. Rayner and S. C. Sereno, Eye movements control in reading: Psycholinguistic studies, Handbook of psycholinguistics, pp.57-82, 1994.

K. Rayner, M. Carlson, and L. Frazier, The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, vol.22, issue.3, pp.358-374, 1983.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90236-0

K. Rayner, S. C. Sereno, R. K. Morris, A. R. Schmauder, and C. Clifton, Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.33, issue.3-4, pp.21-49, 1989.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03206369

A. Schafer, J. Carter, C. Clifton, and L. Frazier, Focus in Relative Clause Construal, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.7, issue.1-2, pp.135-163, 1996.
DOI : doi:10.1121/1.402450

C. Schwarze, The Treatment of the French Adjectif Detache in Lexical Functional Grammar, Natural language parsing and linguistic theories, pp.262-288, 1988.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-009-1337-0_10

J. C. Sedivy and M. J. Spivey-knowlton, The use of structural, lexical, and pragmatic information in parsing attachment ambiguities, Perspectives on sentence processing, pp.389-413, 1994.

I. Sekerina, (sous presse) The late closure principle in processing of ambiguous Russian sentences. A paraître dans les actes de la 2 nd conférence Européenne sur la description formelle des langues Slaves

L. P. Shapiro, H. N. Nagel, and B. A. Levine, Preferences for a Verb???s Complements and Their Use in Sentence Processing, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.32, issue.1, pp.96-114, 1993.
DOI : 10.1006/jmla.1993.1006

M. J. Spivey-knowlton and J. C. Sedivy, Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints, Cognition, vol.55, issue.3, pp.227-267, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00647-4

M. Spivey-knowlton and M. Tanenhaus, Referential context and syntactic ambiguity resolution, Perspectives on sentence processing, pp.415-439, 1994.

M. J. Spivey-knowlton, J. C. Trueswell, and M. K. Tanenhaus, Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: Discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses., Reading and language processing, pp.148-181, 1995.
DOI : 10.1037/h0078826

L. M. Stallings, M. C. Macdonald, and P. G. Seaghdha, Phrasal Ordering Constraints in Sentence Production: Phrase Length and Verb Disposition in Heavy-NP Shift, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.39, issue.3, pp.392-417, 1998.
DOI : 10.1006/jmla.1998.2586

M. Steedman and G. Altmann, Ambiguity in context: A reply, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.4, issue.3-4, pp.105-122, 1989.
DOI : 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90011-3

P. Sturt and M. W. Crocker, Monotonic Syntactic Processing: A Cross-linguistic Study of Attachment and Reanalysis, Language and Cognitive Processes, vol.18, issue.5, pp.449-494, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01068016

P. Sturt and M. W. Crocker, Thematic monotonicity, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol.26, issue.3, pp.297-322, 1997.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1025076608204

P. Sturt, M. J. Pickering, and M. W. Crocker, Structural Change and Reanalysis Difficulty in Language Comprehension, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.40, issue.1, pp.136-150, 1999.
DOI : 10.1006/jmla.1998.2606

P. Sturt, M. J. Pickering, and M. W. Crocker, Search strategies in syntactic reanalysis, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol.29, issue.2, pp.183-194, 2000.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1005145028351

. Le and . Qu, il pensait avoir raté a été reporté à plus tard

. La-voiture-qu, il croyait volée est garée en bas de chez lui

. Paul-alors-qu, il était encore jeune s'est engagé dans l'armée

. La-chambre-de-bonne and . Qu, il loue depuis un mois est en mauvais état

. La-jupe-qu, elle aimait bien est maintenant qu'elle a grandi trop petite. La rue qui était a sens unique est maintenant a double sens. La villa qu'il a retapée quand il était à la retraite a été démolie

. La-journée-qu, ils sont partis en pique-nique était ensoleillée

. La-supérette-qu, elle faisait ses courses est fermée pour le mois d'août

. Au-petit-déjeuner-j, ai taché ma nouvelle chemise avec de l'eau. Pour amuser les petits enfants il porte un masque effrayant

«. Chaque-phrase and . Sujet, était présentée dans les deux conditions suivantes : ? Le verbe principal était purement intransitif (sauf dans certains cas où le verbe était transitif mais ne pouvait admettre qu'un objet inanimé)

. Parce, Éric ne comprenait pas la traductrice quitta la pièce

. Parce, Éric n'obéissait pas la traductrice quitta la pièce

. Aussitôt, Adrien eut fini de servir la princesse se précipita dehors

. Aussitôt, Adrien eut fini de délirer la princesse se précipita dehors

. Au-petit-déjeuner-j, ai taché ma nouvelle chemise avec de l'eau. Pour amuser les petits enfants il porte un masque effrayant

. Parce, Éric ne comprenait pas la traductrice il quitta la pièce

. Aussitôt, Adrien eut fini de servir la princesse il se précipita dehors

. Graham, on the bar / to look behind him / at the attractive girl. Graham told someone to look at an attractive girl RIGHT

. Dodd, the traveller / who was standing / nearby / that he had just / got out of prison

. Dodd, that he had just / got out of prison / but insisted that he was not / dangerous. Dodd told someone that he had just got out of prison RIGHT

. Dodd, confessed to the traveller / who it was that was his / regular accomplice and / who had never / worked with him in / earlier crimes. Dodd told someone which person had denounced him RIGHT

. Smith, Smith announced that he would like to go to live in the United States RIGHT, Bristol / that he would like

. Tom, the student / looking for a / place to eat / that the best restaurant / was in town. Tom indicated that the best restaurant was in town RIGHT

. Tom, indicated to the student / who it was that had the best / voice and / who was / the worst singer / in the choral. Tom indicated which singer was very rich RIGHT

. Percy, the boy / who was eating / an ice cream / that she knew his

. Percy, eating an / ice cream / that she knew his / mother / a long time ago. Percy said that he knew the mother of the boy a long time ago RIGHT

. Percy, revealed to the boy / who it was that was / his brother and who was / his real mother / and where they / lived. Percy said which woman was the real sister of the boy RIGHT

. John, the manager / counting / the money in / the cash-box / that he knew the / robber's name. John said that he knew the robber's name RIGHT