Longitudinal study of taste identification of sensory panellists: Effect of Ageing, Experience and Exposure, Food Quality and Preference, vol.18, issue.2, pp.230-241, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.11.003
EFFECT OF PRODUCT KNOWLEDGE ON PROFILING PERFORMANCE COMPARING VARIOUS SENSORY LABORATORIES, Journal of Sensory Studies, vol.5, issue.3, pp.66-80, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2007.00096.x
Genetics of Sensory Thresholds: Individual Taste Reactions for Different Substances, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, p.84, 1935. ,
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.21.2.84
Postharvest quality of apple predicted by NIR-spectroscopy: Study of the effect of biological variability on spectra and model performance, Postharvest biology and technology, pp.55-133, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.09.006
Food texture and viscosity: concept and measurement, 2002. ,
Texture Profile Method, Journal of Food Science, vol.28, issue.4, pp.404-409, 1963. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1963.tb00215.x
Statistical testing of individual differences in sensory profiling, Food Quality and Preference, vol.14, issue.5-6, pp.5-6, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0950-3293(03)00007-7
Accounting for scaling differences in sensory profile data: improved mixed model analysis of variance, manuscript intended for Food Quality and Preference, 2012. ,
Modelling individual differences between assessors in sensory evaluations, Food Quality and Preference, vol.5, issue.3, pp.215-224, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0950-3293(94)90037-X
Sensory evaluation by small postharvest teams and the relationship with instrumental measurements of apple texture, Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol.59, issue.2, pp.179-186, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.08.021
Within and between tree variability in fruit characteristics associated with bitter pit incidence of ???Braeburn??? apple, The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, vol.73, issue.4, pp.555-561, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1080/14620316.1998.11511014
Influences respectives de la texture, pp.263-292, 2012. ,
Flavor profiles?A new approach to flavor problems, Food Technology, vol.4, issue.8, p.308, 1950. ,
Sensory analysis of Spanish mandarin juices. Selection of attributes and panel performance, Food Quality and Preference, vol.18, issue.2, pp.329-341, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.02.008
Effect of Apple Shape on Acoustic Measurements of Firmness, Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, vol.56, issue.3, pp.253-266, 1993. ,
DOI : 10.1006/jaer.1993.1077
A study of assessors' performance using graphical methods, Food Quality and Preference, vol.8, issue.5-6, pp.5-6, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0950-3293(97)00025-6
Outlier and group detection in sensory panels using hierarchical cluster analysis with the Procrustes distance, Food Quality and Preference, vol.15, issue.3, pp.195-208, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0950-3293(03)00058-2
Identifying outlying assessors in sensory profiling using fuzzy clustering and multi-block methodology, Food Quality and Preference, vol.20, issue.4, pp.287-294, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.12.001
Relationships between perceived sensory properties and major preference directions of 12 varieties of apples from the Southern Hemisphere, Food Quality and Preference, vol.7, issue.2, pp.113-126, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0950-3293(95)00043-7
A Comparison of 14 Jams Characterized by Conventional Profile and a Quick Original Method, the Flash Profile, Journal of Food Science, vol.35, issue.5, pp.826-834, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0950-3293(99)00028-2
Development of an automated monitoring device to quantify changes in firmness of apples during storage, Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol.18, issue.1, pp.1-8, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0925-5214(99)00063-0
A methodological approach for the identification and quantification of sources of biological variance in postharvest research, Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol.39, issue.1, pp.1-9, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2005.09.004
Postharvest quality and sensory attributes of organically and conventionally grown apples, HortScience, issue.10, pp.27-1096, 1992. ,
Évaluation sensorielle: manuel méthodologique, 2009. ,
Analysis of variation and multivariate relationships among analytical and sensory characteristics in whole apple evaluation, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol.28, issue.3, pp.329-338, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1002/jsfa.2740690309
Assessing panel consonance, Food Quality and Preference, vol.6, issue.1, pp.7-14, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0950-3293(94)P4207-M
A review of acoustic research for studying the sensory perception of crisp, crunchy and crackly textures, Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol.12, issue.1, pp.17-24, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0924-2244(01)00050-4
Etude de la possibilit?? de mesurer simultan??ment la fermet?? de la chair et de l'??piderme des pommes, Sciences des Aliments, vol.20, issue.2, pp.253-264, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.3166/sda.20.253-264
Sensory evaluation of heating and air conditioning systems, Energy and Buildings, vol.34, issue.6, pp.647-651, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00015-4
Characterization of traditional and exotic apple varieties from Portugal. Part 1-Nutritional, phytochemical and sensory evaluation, Journal of Functional Foods, issue.2, pp.35-45, 2010. ,
Feedback calibration: A training method for descriptive panels, Food Quality and Preference, vol.18, issue.2, pp.321-328, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.02.007
Use of feedback calibration to reduce the training time for wine panels, Food Quality and Preference, vol.17, issue.3-4, pp.3-4, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.07.005
DYNAMIC ELASTIC PROPERTIES AND SENSORY QUALITY OF APPLE FRUIT, Journal of Texture Studies, vol.1, issue.1, pp.62-74, 1971. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1955.tb07791.x
La pomme -Bilan de campagne, 2010. ,
Les petits secret des pommes. ça m'intéresse, pp.88-90, 2010. ,
Sensory analysis of individual strawberry fruit and comparison with instrumental analysis, Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol.52, issue.2, pp.164-172, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.11.006
An apple a day: the influence of memory on consumer judgment of quality, Food Quality and Preference, vol.13, issue.3, pp.173-179, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00013-7
Eating quality standards for apples based on consumer preferences, Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol.50, issue.1, pp.70-78, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.03.020
Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements 1: texture of apple fruit, Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol.24, issue.3, pp.225-239, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00158-2
Penetrometer measurement of apple and kiwifruit firmness: operator and instrument differences, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, vol.121, issue.5, pp.927-936, 1996. ,
Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements 2: sweet and acid taste of apple fruit, Postharvest biology and technology, pp.241-250, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00157-0
Procedures for the sensory evaluation of horticultural crops [Quality, color and texture], HortScience, vol.18, issue.1, pp.18-22, 1983. ,
The impact of biological variation on postharvest population dynamics, Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol.26, issue.3, pp.253-263, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0925-5214(02)00044-3
The impact of biological variation on postharvest behaviour of tomato fruit, Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol.34, issue.3, pp.271-284, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.05.014
USE OF CONFIDENCE ELLIPSES IN A PCA APPLIED TO SENSORY ANALYSIS APPLICATION TO THE COMPARISON OF MONOVARIETAL CIDERS, Journal of Sensory Studies, vol.17, issue.5, pp.510-518, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0950-3293(01)00015-5
Confidence ellipse for the sensory profiles obtained by principal component analysis, Food Quality and Preference, vol.16, issue.3, pp.245-250, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.04.019
Construction of confidence area in sensometry, 11th Sensometrics, 2012. ,
Texture analysis of Red Delicious fruit: Towards multiple measurements on individual fruit, Food Quality and Preference, vol.18, issue.6, pp.825-833, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.09.012
Vocabulaire International de Métrologie ? Concepts fondamentaux et généraux et termes associés, 2007. ,
Perspectives in the textural evaluation of plant foods, Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol.6, issue.6, pp.187-194, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0924-2244(00)89053-6
Consumer preferences for fresh and aged apples: a cross-cultural comparison, Food Quality and Preference, vol.9, issue.5, pp.355-366, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0950-3293(98)00031-7
A comparison of ethylene production, maturity and controlled atmosphere storage life of Gala, Fuji and Lady Williams apples (Malus domestica, Borkh.), Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol.6, issue.3-4, pp.3-4, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0925-5214(94)00002-A
Instrumental and sensory analysis of fresh Norwegian and imported apples, Food Quality and Preference, vol.10, pp.4-5, 1999. ,
Anisotropy in the fracture properties of apple flesh as investigated by crack-opening tests, Journal of Materials Science, vol.22, issue.1, pp.45-51, 1993. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF00349031
Quantitative genetic analysis and comparison of physical and sensory descriptors relating to fruit flesh firmness in apple ( Malus pumila Mill.), TAG Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol.100, issue.7, pp.1074-1084, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s001220051389
A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF A TRAINED SENSORY PANEL, Journal of Sensory Studies, vol.11, issue.2, pp.567-582, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0950-3293(97)00040-2
Effect of storage conditions on the relationship between apple firmness and texture acceptability, Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol.32, issue.2, pp.205-211, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2003.11.012
Sensory quality of scab-resistant apple cultivars, Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol.23, issue.1, pp.41-50, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00091-6
lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package). R package version 1, pp.0-2, 2012. ,
Training is a critical step to obtain reliable product profiles in a real food industry context, Food Quality and Preference, vol.15, issue.4, pp.341-348, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0950-3293(03)00081-8
Évaluation par l'analyse sensorielle des qualités organoleptiques d'anciennes variétés de pommes, Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ, vol.5, issue.3, pp.180-188, 2001. ,
Descriptive analysis, Sensory evaluation of food: principles and practices, pp.341-378, 1998. ,
Introduction and overview, Sensory evaluation of food: principles and practices, pp.1-27, 1998. ,
Sensory evaluation of food: principles and practices, 1998. ,
Could selection tests detect the future performance of descriptive panellists?, Food Quality and Preference, vol.7, issue.3-4, pp.3-4, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0950-3293(96)00022-5
FINITE ELEMENT MODELING OF TRANSIENT RESPONSES OF APPLES TO IMPULSE EXCITATION, Transactions of the ASAE, vol.40, issue.5, pp.1395-1406, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.13031/2013.21366
THE PANELIST EFFECT ? FIXED OR RANDOM?, Journal of Sensory Studies, vol.3, issue.2, pp.113-121, 1988. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1745-459X.1988.tb00434.x
USE OF CONTRASTS FOR THE EVALUATION OF PANEL INCONSISTENCY, Journal of Sensory Studies, vol.4, issue.2, pp.265-277, 1990. ,
DOI : 10.1002/jsfa.2740350513
DESIGNS TO BALANCE THE EFFECT OF ORDER OF PRESENTATION AND FIRST-ORDER CARRY-OVER EFFECTS IN HALL TESTS, Journal of Sensory Studies, vol.2, issue.2, pp.129-148, 1989. ,
DOI : 10.1002/jsfa.2740470113
Les caractéristiques d'une réponse sensorielles, Évaluation sensorielle: manuel méthodologique, pp.7-33, 2009. ,
Métrologie sensorielle, Évaluation sensorielle: manuel méthodologique, pp.35-45, 2009. ,
Recherche de descripteurs objectifs de la qualité sensorielle des pommes (Malus domestica) Université de Nantes -Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, 2004. ,
Relationship between sensory analysis, penetrometry and visible???NIR spectroscopy of apples belonging to different cultivars, Food Quality and Preference, vol.14, issue.5-6, pp.473-484, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0950-3293(03)00012-0
Prediction of the sensory quality of apples by physical measurements, Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol.34, issue.3, pp.257-269, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.05.017
Relationship between apple sensory attributes and instrumental parameters of texture, Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, vol.14, pp.25-37, 2006. ,
4 -Factors influencing sensory verdicts, Sensory evaluation techniques, pp.37-42, 1991. ,
Addressing potential sources of variation in several non-destructive techniques for measuring firmness in apples, Biosystems Engineering, vol.104, issue.1, pp.33-46, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.05.004
Relationship between Acoustic Firmness and Magness Taylor Firmness in Royal Gala and Golden Smoothee Apples, Food Science and Technology International, vol.15, issue.1, pp.31-40, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1177/1082013208100507
A model for overall description of food quality, Food Quality and Preference, vol.6, issue.3, pp.185-190, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0950-3293(94)00037-V
A quality measurement for sensory profile analysis The contribution of extended cross-validation and resampling techniques, Food Quality and Preference, vol.12, issue.5-7, pp.5-7, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0950-3293(01)00030-1
Product testing and sensory evaluation of foods Marketing and R&D approaches. Food and Nutrition, 1983. ,
Descriptive sensory analysis: past, present and future, Food Research International, vol.34, issue.6, pp.461-471, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0963-9969(01)00070-9
Handling individual differences between assessors in sensory profiling, Food Quality and Preference, vol.2, issue.3, pp.187-199, 1990. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0950-3293(90)90023-N
Detecting individual differences among assessors and differences among replicates in sensory profiling, Food Quality and Preference, vol.9, issue.3, pp.107-110, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0950-3293(97)00040-2
Statistics for sensory and consumer science, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1002/9780470669181
Fixed or random assessors in sensory profiling?, Food Quality and Preference, vol.9, issue.3, pp.145-152, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0950-3293(96)00050-X
Postharvest assessment of fruit quality parameters in apple using both instruments and an expert panel, Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol.52, issue.3, pp.279-287, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.01.004
Approche statistique de la performance en analyse sensorielle descriptive, Évaluation sensorielle: manuel méthodologique, pp.451-458, 2009. ,
Influence of hunger on sweetness preferences and taste thresholds, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol.7, issue.3, p.280, 1959. ,
Prediction of the optimal picking date of different apple cultivars by means of VIS/NIR-spectroscopy, Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol.21, issue.2, pp.189-199, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00145-9
Design questions in sensory and consumer science, Food Quality and Preference, vol.6, issue.4, pp.217-220, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0950-3293(95)00016-X
La performance en analyse sensorielle, une approche base de données, 2006. ,
Mixed-effects models in S and S-plus ©, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4419-0318-1
Characterization ofGala'Apple Aroma and Flavor: Differences between Controlled Atmosphere and Air Storage, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, vol.124, issue.4, pp.416-423, 1999. ,
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2012. ,
Sensory characteristics, quality and optical properties measured by time-resolved reflectance spectroscopy in stored apples, Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol.58, issue.1, pp.1-12, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.05.003
Correcting for different use of the scale and the need for further analysis of individual differences in sensory analysis, Food Quality and Preference, vol.19, issue.2, pp.197-209, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.06.008
Assessing sensory panelist performance using repeatability and reproducibility measures, Food Quality and Preference, vol.12, issue.5-7, pp.5-7, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0950-3293(01)00038-6
Postharvest quality of integrated and organically produced apple fruit, Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol.45, issue.1, pp.11-19, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.01.006
Instrumental and sensory quality characteristics of'Gala'apples in response to prestorage heat, controlled atmosphere, and air storage, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, vol.127, issue.6, pp.1006-1012, 2002. ,
An Approximate Distribution of Estimates of Variance Components, Biometrics Bulletin, vol.2, issue.6, pp.110-114, 1946. ,
DOI : 10.2307/3002019
L'évaluation sensorielle des denrées alimentaires: aspects méthodologiques, 1982. ,
GRAPES: A METHOD AND A SAS?? PROGRAM FOR GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATIONS OF ASSESSOR PERFORMANCES, Journal of Sensory Studies, vol.5, issue.2, pp.157-170, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1745-459X.1994.tb00238.x
CAP: Une méhode et un outil de contrôle rapide et synthétique des performances des sujets en évaluation sensorielle descripitve, 1997. ,
Batch variability and cultivar keeping quality of cucumber, Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol.32, issue.3, pp.299-310, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2003.12.005
An overview of variance component estimation, Metrika, vol.65, issue.1, pp.215-230, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF01894301
From profiles to practice: Communicating the sensory characteristics of apples to the wider audience through simplified descriptive profiles, LWT - Food Science and Technology, vol.47, issue.1, pp.46-55, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.lwt.2012.01.003
Nondestructive dynamic testing of apples for firmness evaluation, Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol.29, issue.3, pp.287-299, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0925-5214(03)00039-5
Comparison of multivariate methods of analysis to evaluate panellists' performance, Food Quality and Preference, vol.3, issue.4, pp.201-201, 1991. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0950-3293(91)90034-C
Individual differences in taste perception, Food Chemistry, vol.56, issue.3, pp.303-311, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0308-8146(96)00027-1
An approach to sensory evaluation of horticultural commodities [Fresh market tomatoes, HortScience, vol.15, issue.1, pp.48-50, 1980. ,
Sensory Evaluation by Quantitative Descriptive Analysis, IFT Annual Mtg, pp.20-24, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1002/9780470385036.ch1c
Sensory Evaluation by Quantitative Descriptive Analysis, Food Technology, pp.23-34, 1974. ,
DOI : 10.1002/9780470385036.ch1c
Sensory evaluation practices, 2004. ,
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TWO OPPOSITE SIDES OF BICOLOURED APPLES: SENSORY AND INSTRUMENTAL MEASUREMENTS, International Conference Postharvest Unlimited, ISHS, pp.383-387, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.599.48
Texture is a sensory property, Food Quality and Preference, vol.13, issue.4, pp.215-225, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0950-3293(01)00039-8
Analysis of sensory assessors in texture profiling of potatoes by multivariate modelling, Food Quality and Preference, vol.11, issue.4, pp.283-288, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0950-3293(99)00045-2
Biological variance, burden or benefit? Postharvest biology and technology, pp.15-25, 2003. ,
Modelling the biological variance of the yellow aspect of Granny Smith apple colour, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol.194, issue.5, pp.90-798, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1002/jsfa.3887
Visualization of sensory profiling data for performance monitoring. LWT-Food Science and Technology, pp.262-269, 2007. ,
Shelf-life estimation of ???Fuji??? apples: Sensory characteristics and consumer acceptability, Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol.38, issue.1, pp.18-24, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2005.05.009
Shelf-life estimation of ???Fuji??? apples, Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol.50, issue.1, pp.64-69, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.03.016
Pomme-poire: de la récolte au conditionnement: outils pratiques, 2004. ,
Reconnaître les variétés de pommes et de poires/Recognizing apple and pear varieties, Recherche, vol.67, p.2, 2000. ,
Designing consumer trials balanced for first and higher orders of carry-over effect when only a subset of k samples from t may be tested, Food Quality and Preference, vol.6, issue.4, pp.299-308, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0950-3293(95)00032-1
New approaches to understanding and controlling cell separation in relation to fruit and vegetable texture, Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol.8, issue.7, pp.213-221, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0924-2244(97)01052-2
Apple Quality: Influences of Pre-and Postharvest Factors and Estimation by Objective Methods, Evaluation of Quality of Fruits and Vegetables, pp.63-81, 1985. ,
Sensory characteristics of apple fruit, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, vol.105, issue.3, pp.371-375, 1980. ,
ARE ORGANICALLY GROWN APPLES TASTIER AND HEALTHIER? A COMPARATIVE FIELD STUDY USING CONVENTIONAL AND ALTERNATIVE METHODS TO MEASURE FRUIT QUALITY, Acta Hort, ISHS, pp.417-426, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.517.53
A new approach to the sensory analysis of foods and beverages, Progress in Flavour Research, pp.35-50, 1984. ,
A language and procedure for the sensory assessment of cox's orange pippin apples, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol.3, issue.12, pp.28-1090, 1977. ,
DOI : 10.1002/jsfa.2740281210
Experimental Designs Balanced for the Estimation of Residual Effects of Treatments, Australian Journal of Chemistry, vol.2, issue.2, pp.149-168, 1949. ,
DOI : 10.1071/CH9490149
Effect of training procedure on the performance of descriptive panels, Food Quality and Preference, vol.5, issue.3, pp.203-214, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0950-3293(94)90036-1
Non-destructive tests on the prediction of apple fruit flesh firmness and soluble solids content on tree and in shelf life, Journal of Food Engineering, vol.77, issue.2, pp.254-260, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.06.027