The Syrian conflict has become one of the worst disasters of modern times. Therefore, the rebuilding process requires huge investments in the infrastructure and public services. The Syrian economy, dominated by the public sector, has witnessed structural and significant changes since 1946. Gradually, the State pursued a progressive policy of economic reform and liberalization to give wider space for the private sector to contribute in the economy. In that context, the promulgation of the investment law No. 10 of 1991 has been seen as the cornerstone legislation for the private investment and economic growth. The second step in this regard was the Decree No. 8 of 2007 on the promotion of investments in the country. Therefore, the concept of partnership with the private sector has been progressively accepted by the public sector. Hence, the promulgation of the public-Private Partnership (PPP) law No.5 of 2016. The specificity of the PPP law lies in its legal nature, as it could be placed at the crossroads of the public and the private law classifications. In this case, the country needs a legal framework for protection of local and foreign investors. Therefore, the PPP law constitutes, among others, a legal driver to rebuild Syria. The research offers an explanatory presentation of the issuance of the PPP Law and its implementation process in a country emerging from a conflict. Therefore, the research question relies on asking how, and to what degree can the public-private partnership law plays a crucial role and be one of the leading investment tools in the rebuilding process? Furthermore, what are the most suitable contractual and dispute resolution methods utilized for such interest? The study prepared the introduction for PPP through defining each terms of the public sector, private sector, and public services. Then, the PPP concept is addressed by distinguishing its several definitions through civil law and common law systems. This was a comprehensive entry for studying and analyzing the Syrian PPP law provisions and its legal, economic, and social circumstances. This would help the research to identify the potential legal gaps in the different phases of a PPP process. In that context, a chapter is dedicated to compare several PPP laws and experiences, although the PPP text law of different countries, including Syria, is quite similar in the format and shape of provisions. However, the main disparities are in the legal framework preparing the PPP's issuance and in the implementation understanding of PPP projects. The selected countries are France, the United Kingdom, China, and the United Arab Emirates. Thereby, the research analyses two European countries and two Asian countries to have a comprehensive view of the main different legal systems in the world. The research studied the implementation processes of PPP. This implementation framework contains examining the technical, contractual, and settlement of disputes mechanisms of PPP per the PPP law. The outcome of this thesis indicated that Syria has an opposite two folded sides. On the one hand, the country stills have gaps in implementing the partnership. There is inaccessibility of adequate skills and expertise in managing partnership contracts and transactions, and the absence of readiness of the cultural and public environment for such an undertaking. However, on the other hand, we cannot neglect the several successful projects that were established under BOT premises in Syria and the flexibility provided in the text of PPP law. Therefore, it is essential to focus on the success conditions of partnership in Syria and on the appropriate area of PPP applications and domains.